Archive for June, 2010

Spies like me

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

How did a ring of 11 Russian spies live among us for years, undetected? Clearly, they passed by being just like us: Ivy Leaguers.  “007-worthy” hotties. Growers of prize-worthy flowers. Canadians. Ahem.

Sexual schizophrenia

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Could the critics who think that educated, upper-middle-class women today are hooking up too much please get together with the commentators who think we’re in the midst of a sexual malaise?

The latter includes cultural contrarian Camille Paglia, who argued in an everything-but-the-kitchen-sink Times column over the weekend that modern American society is lacking in lust. Or at least those of us who are smart, white, and reasonably well-off. Among the culprits:

  • Women in the workplace.
  • Badly dressed men.
  • Women who don’t like the cheap push-up bras at Victoria’s Secret.
  • Lame-ass rock ‘n roll.
  • Too much sex at the movies.
  • Women who work out.

I’m not buying that we live in some sort of new Age of Prudishness. In fact, wouldn’t the debate over Viagra and Female Viagra, the supposed hook for Paglia’s column, indicate that there are people, men and women, who want to have sex? Or, at least drug-company market research suggests that they do?

Truthfully, I’m skeptical that we’ve entered into a new sexual paradigm, of prudishness or of promiscuity. The only thing new under the sun, sexually, it seems to me is that there are more of us, and more forums in which, to dissect and discuss, editorialise, blog, and tweet.

RIP, Mr. Senator

Monday, June 28th, 2010

As a reporter, I’m not supposed to get close to my sources. And, really, I can’t say that I was close to Sen. Robert C. Byrd. In the five years I covered the Senate, I knew him as a formal man, wrapped in rectitude, proper, perhaps even a bit uptight.

But still, I couldn’t help but like his gentlemanliness and the way that he would, occasionally, let his less-decorous side show through: When he teared up at a hearing after his dog, Billy Byrd, died. His off-key serenade on my 26th birthday.  How his Southern soft touch melted my uptight Northern mother. His unchecked anger, flaring on the Senate floor. The way he’d look at his wife, Erma, ever tender after decades together.

Rent boy

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

Wanted: White guy in a tie. No experience necessary.

Yup, that’s all you need to land a job as an “executive” in China, according to a piece in The Atlantic — pale skin and a suit. In China’s image-driven business culture, appearing to have connections to the West — even fake ones — is important, says Mitch Moxley, who writes of his stint as a “quality-control expert” at a Shandong province construction site. “Having foreigners in nice suits,” explains his Chinese-language tutor, “gives the company face.”

There could be real business possibilities here, though. The recession disproportionately threw exactly this demographic — middle-aged guys — out of work. Maybe it’s America’s new export opportunity?

Auto-incorrect

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

Of all the things I love about my iPhone, one of my most favourite is the autocorrect function, the gadget’s ability to intuit the word you want to type, just a letter or two in. Among the words autocorrect has correctly spelled for me are risotto, tryptophan, soufflé, maraschino, USAID, and Huxley.

True, autocorrect has its foibles. After almost a year of iPhone ownership, it only now has begun to recognise my name, despite the dozens of emails sent out daily over my sig. The device can be overly fond of contractions and prudish about profanity. Thus its becomes it’s, hell turns into he’ll, and fuckers for some reason is rendered as duckers.

The Times‘ David Pogue solicited the Twitterverse to draw up a list of some of autocorrect’s worst bloopers. As he notes, when autocorrect is wrong, “it can be really wrong.” Among some of the laugh-outloud submissions:

  • Type “aww” using Word on a Nokia phone, and you get “byzantine.”
  • iPhone corrected “Sorry about your fever” to “Sorry about your feces.” iPhone enjoys sophomoric humor.
  • Brand-new phone. I started typing “medical,” and after 4 letters, it wanted to correct to “Jedi.”
  • I texted a female coworker once, “Come over for a sec,” and it autocorrected to “Come over for a sex.” Was my face red! :-( .
  • If you tell your wife “nah,” the iPhone calls her a “nag.”

Of Charlotte and men

Friday, June 25th, 2010

The Beach Boys wished we all could be California Girls. And apparently, we wish you all could be Charlotte Guys.

A recent “study” ranked the North Carolina burgh the nation’s manliest city, where men are men and women love them for their home-improvement-store shopping, pickup-truck driving, salty-snack eating ways.

Yes, the per capita consumption of salty snacks is one measure of masculinity. Did I forget to add that said “study” was sponsored by Combos?

If you know what a Combo is, I figure you either have a lot of hair on your chest or a lot fat on your gut.

Fucked up

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

All the Samanthas out there are really crying on the inside.

That’s the conclusion of a recent essay in The Chronicle Review, which rounds up a surprising wealth of literature on sex differences when it comes to casual sex. Women, the authors conclude,  bear steep emotional costs from hooking up, an evolutionary legacy, it seems, from a time when they had to be especially choosy with their mates if they wanted their offspring to survive and thrive.

The writers trot out any number of examples of supposedly sexually liberated women who realise they want for an emotional connection, from Katie Roiphe, who feels “sick” after a surfeit of “anonymous” dalliances to Kate Fillion who retroactively, and perhaps compulsively, decides she must be in love with every partner she’s ever had. Men, by contrast, report feeling less guilt and more enjoyment from hook-ups.

The most telling piece of data, however, comes from a survey of college seniors and high-school freshmen, each of whom are asked if they would have sex after a particularly great first date: Thirty percent of ninth-grade girls said they’d consider sleeping with the guy, while only 5 percent of the college  women would. No doubt, the high schoolers’ response is coloured by bravado, peer pressure, and a desire to seem older and experienced but, still, it argues that women sour on casual sex as they come to understand its emotional price tag.

I was either a prude or a romantic — depending on your perspective — at 14, so I would have then said an emphatic “no” to first-date sex. Now, I don’t know if I’d be quite so absolutist. Like most women, I suppose, I have, at times, gambled, hoping, somehow, that sex without strings could ultimately lead to a meaningful bond.

Oink, oink

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

Growing up, I hated bacon — and anything to do with a pig, really. I couldn’t stand the greasiness, the fat, the way its odor seemed to cling to surfaces long after the meal was done.

I’ve since come around, a convert to pancetta and pork belly. Still, I don’t think I could go as whole hog — tee-hee — as the attendees of the first-ever Camp Bacon. Described by the Post as the “Davos of cured and/or smoked pork,” the one-day event featured porcine history, trivia, and, disturbingly, tchotchkes (bacon earrings?!).

And, of course, lots and lots of food:

Although there would be bacon tastings through the dozen presentations, if any of the approximately 70 participants got hungry, all they needed to do was hold up the mini-skillet at the center of each table and a camp counselor would bring more.

Seriously, it’s the kind of event that seems like it ought to be sponsored by Lipitor.

Bike bashing

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Gloria Steinem is credited with observing, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.”

But that was yesterday’s aphorism. Today’s feminist maxim, Chinese bachelorette style: “I would rather cry in a BMW than smile on the back of my boyfriend’s bicycle.”

Viva la douche

Monday, June 21st, 2010

I have a bit of a love-hate relationship with Twitter. See, I make my living by writing 4,000-word articles. So, a medium that prizes extreme brevity may not exactly play to my skills.

Plus, I’m kind of irritated about its use as a tool of self-promotion. I post my own stories, of course, pushing them out on my “real” Twitter account. But I feel kind of conflicted. To me, self-promotion is one of the seven deadly sins, along with poor spelling, B.O., chewing with one’s mouth open, self-righteousness, dishonesty, and failure to observe proper sidewalk etiquette.

Thus, I was kind of sympathetic to Buzz Bissinger’s New Republic screed on his tumultous relationship with the social-networking site. In particular, I related to his approach, Twitter-as-anger-management:

With Twitter, I now had an outlet. I used profanity, because that’s the way I talk, the perfect sentence being one in which the f-bomb appears as adverb, verb, adjective, and noun, as in, “You kind sir, go fuckly fuck yourself, you fuck of a fuckhead.”

What I cannot condone, however, is this: douche juice. Really?! Douche juice?! Who throws around such a term? What kind of perjorative is that? Why not just weenie?

Seriously, swear like a real man.